A tour of Klee Plaza at Six Corners
Posted 2/11/2008 by Patrick RollensThis interesting project - 64 condos in the heart of Portage Park on the Northwest Side - managed to completely escape our notice while it was under development (at least in the annals of YoChicago). Now Klee Plaza at Six Corners is in delivery, and about 20 condos remain.
In this video, developer Marc Sussman walks us through several model units. The Klee Building's interior layout afforded some interesting homes, including a handful on the top level that aspire to true loft-hood. This week we'll follow up with an updated price list and some still photos of the project - including the 19,000 square feet of ground-floor retail space that's still under construction.


Comments
2/11/08
Lou Barreiro said:
This intersection has a lot of potential for retail and residential developments. It is close to the expressway,the Blue Line, and Milwaukee north of Irving Park is pedestrian friendly (or easily could be). It will be interesting to see how these condos will affect the area, and also all the other constructions happening nearby on the boderline of Portage Park and Irving Park.
Patrick Rollens said:
Interestingly, Marc Sussman mentioned that they were having trouble leasing the ground-floor retail space. Seems contrary to the neighborhood, methinks.
j. smith said:
I think the main issue with leasing the retail space has been parking. There were some articles in the local Pioneer Press newspsper (RIP), that discussed the issues. Retailers were wanting a curb cut so cars could turn into the parking lot and others opposed this stating that it would make the area less pedestrian friendly.
Local Realtor said:
I believe that many of the difficulties encountered in the renovation of this building is it's landmark or near-landmark quality. They didn't want to destroy too much of the original structural features in the interest of modernization.
BWChicago said:
Actually, they did an extremely poor job on the exterior, and in my opinion effectively ruined it. The replacement does not match the original in color, texture, or detail (the original had medallions and coping that gave the building its deco-style upward thrust, while this gives it more horizontality due to its mismatch) Compare: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mss2400/1017705084/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/bwchicago/2259754176/
"Built in 1934, at least to the best of our guess"? How could that possibly be unclear? A cursory search would tell you it was started in 1929. The building never had any kind of landmark protection, not even on the worthless color rating scale.
I am very pleased this project happened, but it is unfortunate that the building came out worse-looking. At least they did not hang balconies off it.