Be a better neighbor. Sign up for EveryBlock to follow and discuss neighborhood news.

Sign up for free →

Added Sep 07 2017

Update check Devon Market on Facebook. They sent me a post claiming it was the bottled water tax. Wrong.
Then admitted it was incorrectly applied, only after I blasted the transaction on Facebook , twitter and NextDoor.
They admit they refund the tax to Link/SNAP recipients , but not to customers incorrectly charged??!!

  • Complaint made to the city.
    Buyers read your receipts. Sweetened Beverage Tax applies to beverages Sweetened with natural or artificial sweeteners!!
    Period!!
    All other beverages are not charged SBT !!

  • d3 NOH

    La Croix sweetie darlin la Croix

  • d3 I see what you did and I approve!

  • Wazzup not available

    flavored water with juices etc are taxable

  • Himalayan minerals and electrolytes that are added for taste are taxable. Lake Michigan water out of the tap is free but we still have to pay a fee for purification and delivery through the pipes. Rain water is completely free and untaxed. But, depending on how you collect it, you might have to comply with Illinois Compiled Statutes Section 890.2105 and apply for a State permit before you can drink it.

  • Hey Williamettia, I'm not trying to be snarky at all, just helpful. Please don't waste your money on "alkaline" water. Our body's pH stays within a very very small range naturally, unless you are having a sudden problem with your lungs or kidneys. Food and beverages we ingest are at different levels of pH depending on where they are in the digestive tract and it all happens without any action from us. Just trying to save you some dollars. :-)

  • Sandy in EdgeGlen EdgeGlen since 1987

    Nope—ONLY sweetened beverages are subject to the Cook County tax. There is a City of Chicago “bottled water” tax but it does NOT apply to seltzers (flavored or unflavored), soft drinks (sweetened or unsweetened), and waters to which vitamins, minerals or electrolytes are added, whether to change pH or for specific nutritional benefits. Even distilled water is exempt (BTW, it tastes lousy). ONLY plain bottled water with nothing added to it is subject to the city bottled water tax. Here’s the ordinance, including exemptions:

    https://www.cityofchicago.org/content/dam/city/depts/rev/supp_info/TaxSupportingInformation/BottledWaterTaxGuide1.pdf

    So alkaline water is subject to NEITHER of the above taxes. (And neither are flavored seltzers, so long as they are unsweetened—LaCroix is exempt, and Walgreen’s has gotten its wrist slapped by the County Board for erroneously taxing it).

  • Personally I'm fine with our now expensive tap water. My husband and oncologist want us to try it. I already have a problem paying for water twice.

  • They should brand our tap water. Then, when you pour yourself some, you'd think, "ah, a delicious glass of my premium Great Lakes Glacier Water™!

  • Helen NoH North of Howard for 55 + years

    I like Chicago water.

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    Do you drink straight out of the faucet?

  • I like Chicago water, too, for drinking. I do use filtered water to make coffee, though (based on taste tests).
    I also drink out of a park water fountains. All the time.
    People get way too triggered over tap water and microbes these days. Tap water is fine and safe, unless it's brown and you live in Michigan. If you have lead pipes that aren't coated, that's a problem, but you can figure it out.
    For every living cell in your body, there 10 bacterial cells also living inside and on the surface of your body. So we are basically 90% alien. Yet we spend all our time feverishly protecting ourselves against these alien cells, trying to kill them with Purell and "cleanse" our digestive tracts with fruit and grass juices (no, your body is not a septic system that needs irrigating, it just doesn't work that way. Your digestive tract is more like a rain forest; flooding only harms it).
    For every bad microbe you kill off, you also destroy beneficial microbes. Follow basic hygiene, but welcome the alien cells that enter your organism through sitting on chairs and bus seats, kissing, handshakes, stair rails, door handles, kitchen sinks, lakeshore sand, etc. Bodily contact with strangers is no more risky than contact with family members, and it can be more beneficial because it allows other, families of organisms to enrich your body. If you avoid touching surfaces in public areas, you might think you are protecting yourself--but you are actually cutting off the source of your body's life, impoverishing your own biodiversity.
    Same goes for soap in showers. You don't need to use soap, except on the smelly parts. When you soap down your entire body, you are killing off the beneficial microbes that live on your skin. Skin only needs a water rinse, nothing more.

    Or you can live in hysteria and paranoia and get progressively less healthy. Your choice.

    See a parallel between hatred of immigrants and hatred of microbes? Yup. Both forms of hatred will kill you, not the alien.

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    Enjoy your FLUORIDE.
    Now, I know you're not going to be that stubborn and try to argue that the poison fluoride is good for you, right?
    (I have a Reverse Osmosis system at home. Recommended.)

  • Rob

    Is this your next Troll Crusade Pedro? Gonna try to convince us you think fluoridated water is bad?

  • Reverse osmosis system? That's a good one. Tell us about your cryotherapy tank and hypobaric sleeping chamber too while you're at it. Snicker, snicker.

  • Michael Archangel Donald Trump - An irredeemable moral failure

    Dr. Strangelove anyone?

    "Do you realize that fluoridation is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous Communist plot we have ever had to face?” (Gen. Jack D. Ripper)

  • Sandy in EdgeGlen EdgeGlen since 1987

    Purity of essence!

  • This comment has been removed by EveryBlock staff.
  • Yoda Jedi Master

    Most everyone aware that fluoride is bad for you is
    In pesticides fluoride is used
    Europe rejects fluoride in their water
    Chicago tap water fluoride and lead has, so toxic and brain damaging is
    Get real

  • This comment has been removed by EveryBlock staff because it is a duplicate.
  • Sandy in EdgeGlen EdgeGlen since 1987

    I think I hear the black helicopters…

    Pesticides also contain hydrogen, carbon and oxygen—guess those elements are bad for you as well.

    One reason I didn’t get my first cavity till age 15, despite all the sugary junk we used to eat in the 1950s, was that I was raised on fluoridated NYC tap water. My mother grew up drinking the stuff before they began adding fluoride to it, and was wearing upper & lower denture plates by her 30s.

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    Live, reverse osmosis systems are very easy to instal and they go for around $800-$1700 depending on the functions and quality. That is the best way to remove the neurotoxin FLUORIDE out of your drinking water.
    *Note, look at the back of your toothpaste tube. It says call poison control if you swallow too much.

  • d3 NOH

    Acidic though

  • The reason continental Europe hasn't widely adopted fluoride in water systems mostly has to do with technical challenges (many more small water supply systems, terrain issues, etc.). These decisions were made many years ago, before the rise of unfounded paranoia over fluoride use. But many countries, like Germany, France and Switzerland, have chosen to put fluoride in salt or milk instead, as well as to promote fluoride rinses, so it's not like their citizens are going fluoride free.

    In many countries where water is not fluoridated (Japan, most of Great Britain, Germany, etc.), people get dental exams far more than we do in the U.S. For example, 7 out of 10 British people go to the dentist once a year. In the U.S. only 4 out of 10 do. In Japan, dental health is a national obsession: the average Japanese person goes to the dentist 3.5 times per year!

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    So if you buy a bottle of water and you read the contents and is says:
    Lead-------------->X%
    Fluoride--------->X%
    You'll drink it happily and say "ah, a delicious bottle of my premium Great Lakes Glacier Water™!" ????

    Yeah, right! LOL!

  • Michael Archangel Donald Trump - An irredeemable moral failure

    @Pedrito - You are correct that fluoride/flourine consumed in sufficient amounts is neurotoxic. However, the documented cases of acute fluoride toxicity in humans have been secondary to the exposure of fluoride-based rodenticides or flourine salts consumed over a long period of time and in concentrations that are astronomically higher than the ionic form found in oral health products.

    If you like your reverse osmosis filter, good for you but it is not protecting your from fluoride overexposure.

    Happy to debate the meta-analyses done on the subject with you.

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    My system rejects fluoride and other toxins. That's the while point, if not, then nobody would buy this popular systems.
    Do you refuse to drink the poison fluoride?
    Then Reverse Osmosis is the way to go.

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    Whole

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    These
    I'm driving.

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    So in the end, I don't unerstand why some people get upset and don't like the notion that Chicago's tap water has lead and fluoride. What is it? You don't want to think about it?

  • Water like many things we eat and drink, lack a trail we can physically follow.
    I trust my squash, because they are seeds from squash I planted in the late '70's-''80's, tomatoes too
    Most everything else I'm kinda stuck at the mercy of the companies providing it to me.
    Organic means no pesticides in ground for five years. But what is the life expectancy of pesticides.
    Rinse, cook and store as per the government website on canning and food storage.
    Yes I drink the now expensive tap water that comes from my faucet.
    But I know like me everyone is doing their best to make good healthy choices based on information and knowledge.

  • Michael Archangel Donald Trump - An irredeemable moral failure

    @Pedrito - I do not think anyone denied or got upset over the fact that there is lead and fluoride in filtered, Lake Michigan water. The issue is not that these things exist it is your distortion of the relative danger that they pose and, in particular, the stuff about fluoride.

    I find it interesting you make such a big deal over water (where you have a choice as to whether you will drink tap water or not) and do not take into consideration that you take in about 14,000 liters of "air" every day. In addition to oxygen, nitrogen, argon and other elements, those 14,000 liters also contain carbon monoxide, cadmium, mercury, formaldehyde and dioxins and lead.

  • Pathetic you're up in arms about this and not the tax itself.
    Why don't you call and write EACH of the 18 people on the board who enacted this tax then to put all this time and energy into a single store?

  • Btw LINK card holders ARE NOT charged the tax. I haven't a clue about SNAP.
    So.
    How many times did this occur? Once?
    Did YOU do what WE did?
    Write each one of those 18 crooks on that board and tell them when it comes to reelection their names will be remembered?
    Did you pitch fork these concerns (about the new tax itself) of Facebook?

  • Helen NoH North of Howard for 55 + years

    Personally, I called the office of the only county commissioner who cares about my opinion and thanked him for voting for the sweetened beverage tax.

  • Wazzup not available

    why am I not surprised.

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    Why is it that Democrats LOVE taxation so much?
    Example: Comment by Helen NOH.

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    It's all a con to take and take money from working people. Of course too much sugar is bad for you, but if we follow that criteria, Democrats could tax ANYTHING they feel like. Hey, expect a FAST FOOD TAX in the near future!

  • buy a 12-oz coke, pay 12 cents in tax to remind you of the poison effect. I don't see why there's such a fuss. Just drink water instead.

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    A nice Chicago Fluoride-Lead Cocktail perhaps?

  • Michael Archangel Donald Trump - An irredeemable moral failure

    @Pedrito - Curious as to why you single out Chicago drinking water? You do understand that Lake Michigan provides drinking water for most of Cook County and Lake counties as well as parts of DuPage and Will? Obviously, the lake also provides drinking water to counties in Indiana and Michigan. Is the water quality different? Do the other states not treat Lake Michigan water?

    Do you think that other parts of the country have pure spring drinking water? Based on past measurements, cities like Jacksonville, San Diego, North Las Vegas, and Las Vegas itself have 20 or more measurable contaminants in the water. New York City drinking water has measurable levels of lead.

    Why the focus on Chicago???

  • Sandy in EdgeGlen EdgeGlen since 1987

    Why is it that Republicans think that taxation & regulation are tools of the Devil? (They didn’t before St. Ronald of Reagan). You don’t expect to live in an apartment rent-free, acquire your residence without paying the seller (or lender), or belong to an organization without paying dues and abiding by its rules.

    Booze carries an extra tax. So does tobacco. Driving a car requires being covered for personal injury liability and riding a motorcycle requires wearing a helmet. You want to be free to let your kids’ teeth rot, get morbidly obese and diabetic (you or your kids), crack your skull open when you fall off your motorbike, injure people with your cars and drive up my insurance premiums? Not on my dime. A penny an ounce for sugary drinks isn’t gonna break you—unless you’re such a lousy parent that you let your kids get all their hydration and most of their calories from soda pop.

    And when fast food joints stop handing purchasers an empty cup, directing them to an all-you-can-drink multi-beverage dispenser and go back to pulling cold drinks behind the counter & ringing them up the old-fashioned way, then artificially-sweetened diet sodas can stop being taxed. Free refills on soda is a ridiculous concept anyway—fast food is popular enough that it doesn’t need a loss-leader. And if it does, something is wrong with the food & the service.

  • Helen NoH North of Howard for 55 + years

    When I was a kid, soda pop was an occasional treat, not something I was allowed to drink every day. As a consequence, I didn't get cavities. I still rarely drink pop. When a group of us went out to dinner at I Dream of Falafal on Saturday night, I had water with my meal, ignoring those sweetened beverages in the dispenser. BTW, if you like Middle Eastern food, do try IDOF on Sheridan Rd., perhaps RP's newest restaurant. No liquor license or license for BYOB, but the food is terrific.

  • Jeffrey Littleton Paint/Ceramic/Glass

    The anti pop tax commercials are ridiculous.

  • Jeffrey Littleton Paint/Ceramic/Glass

    Do you need a license for BYOB?

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    Sandy in EdgeGlen, no motorcycle helmet law in IL. You made a mistake.

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    Democrats see taxation as a solution for everything. Raise taxes or cereate new ones.
    The Nanny State is pretty much the way to do it: "We'll tell you what's good or bad for you because you, as a common citizen, are simply not capable of doing the right decissions".
    So that's the great excuse to TAX TAX TAX and collect the revenue that they need to pay for services for people that don't work but always vote for them, the politicians that give them free stuff.
    Who pays? Hard-working people of course.

  • Rob

    "you, as a common citizen, are simply not capable of doing the right decissions". "

    I can easily name 62,984,825 examples of this.

  • This comment has been removed by EveryBlock staff because it is off topic.
  • This comment has been removed by EveryBlock staff because it is off topic.
  • Michael Archangel Donald Trump - An irredeemable moral failure

    Ay, Yodita!

  • Yoda Jedi Master

    Rob, your comment a good example of your disdain for individual freedoms is

  • This comment has been removed by EveryBlock staff because it is off topic.
  • This comment has been removed by EveryBlock staff because it is off topic.
  • This comment has been removed by EveryBlock staff because it is off topic.
  • Helen NoH North of Howard for 55 + years

    Could it be that Jedi Masters don't punctuation understand?

  • Wazzup not available

    49 comments on a wonderful market - is the poster trying to shut Devon Market down?

  • Sandy,
    You're off in your logic.
    We buy flavored waters for $9.99 a case. There's 480 oz. in that case. That's a $4.80 tax OR a 48% tax. you might as well say 50% tax.
    So thinking "it's just a penny" is WAY off.

  • BTW We make it a point to buy those case of flavored water and whatever else taxed like this out of cook county. Not just that but all our groceries.
    I'm glad we have that luxury and even more glad that cook county is loosing even more revenue through us.

  • Jeffery, yes we saw those commercials. They're trying to sell you on this tax.
    If someone wants to feed their kids soda and sugar how am I to stop it and frankly I don't care. If people can't take care of their kids correctly how am I supposed to?
    You can't make stupid less stupid with a commercial but you can sell stupid things to stupid.

  • There are also commercials being aired by--surprise!--the American Beverage Association.

    As usual, people are too naive to realize they are being manipulated by large corporations (corporations for which the health of consumers is their least concern).

    We tax cigarettes because they kill us. Everyone has come to accept cigarette taxes.

    We tax alcohol because consumption of alcohol leads to significant costs for society: car accidents, liver disease, etc. Everyone has accepted alcohol taxes (which total 28% of the cost of these beverages).

    But when it comes to sugary drinks that are making Americans the most obese people in the world and costing our healthcare system billions and leading to early deaths and terrible health, the masses rise up in protest against having to pay a single penny per ounce? Unbelievable.

  • Yes it is unbelievable.
    Unbelievable that someone can't control themselves enough to not drink gallons of soda.
    It's up to the rest of us and a sham tax to keep stupid from drowning themselves in sugar.
    How DARE we ask a person to think for themselves and take responsibility.
    So someone dies because of overindulgence?
    How on Earth is that my problem or fault?
    Just don't say a TAX is going to stop that.
    Lemmings all to eager to give up rights and money for a faux cause and a real tax.

  • People rise up because this tax hits the middle class. The Poor have Link and don't pay taxes on food and beverages. The Rich don't care or can head out of county. This is a tax on the working class. Fun enough my Starbuck sugary goodness is not taxed.

  • This comment has been removed by EveryBlock staff.
  • This has nothing to do with class. It's a tax that hits people who drink unhealthy amounts of sugary drinks and then expect the rest of us to cover their health insurance bills when they inevitably become sick and obsese.

    Everyone else will occasionally pay about a dime when they purchase a coke on a hot day.

  • This comment has been removed by EveryBlock staff.
  • This has everything to do with Class. My Starbuck full of Sugary Goodness is not taxed..Why? Because We can fight back effectively. They are taxing regular joe's the same people who cannot afford a Lawyer to fight property assessments...The City knows exactly who to target.

  • Sandy in EdgeGlen EdgeGlen since 1987

    Actually, your bottle of chilled Frappuccino IS taxed. The price of the Frappuccino that the barista whirls up in the blender from ice & pre-sweetened mix includes the tax. Drinks that start out plain but get sweetened to taste (like those two pumps of chocolate syrup in your mocha latte from the barista or the three packets of sugar you add to your grande black over-roasted coffee at the condiment station) are not. And neither are packages of unsweetened Kool-Aid powder.

  • I'm afraid that's not true, Sandy. The bottled frapuccino at Starbucks gets the tax, but the barista version does not.

    When you look at the range of drinks that get taxed and those that do not, you quickly realize that this is not just a "tax on the middle class." Many "fru fru" drinks, like fancy iced teas or other exotic "health" drinks, are taxed as well. Basically, any bottled or fountain drink that contains sugar, high fructose corn syrup, sucralose, stevia, etc., is taxed. Any drink that is made of 100 percent fruit juice or that is sweetened by fruit juice concentrate is not taxed. But drinks served by a barista are not taxed, unless they include fountain drinks (rum and coke is taxed, coffee ordered with sugar at Dunkin or Starbucks is not).

    *In other words, the distinction is between (A) drinks that are pre-sweeteend (by anything but fruit) vs. (B) drinks that are manually sweetened by a barista or customer.*

    Artificially sweetened drinks are just as bad for you as sugared ones, because they keep you in a state of addiction to sugar and your body responds to them just like it responds to sugar. Artificial sweeteners trigger insulin, which sends your body into fat storage mode and leads to weight gain.

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-cook-county-soda-tax-beverages-0801-biz-20170731-story.html

    Big Soda is fighting hard. Not only are they funding the attack campaign on the Cook Cnty sugary drinks tax, but they have been funding research for years designed to take attention off bottled drinks and onto other health factors--to make us forget about sugar. For example, the study that came out this week that said prolonged sitting kills you. Too much sitting might be bad for you, bug it was an abysmally awful study with very little good research, funded by Coca Cola.

    https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/09/the-new-study-suggesting-sitting-will-kill-you-is-kind-of-a-raging-dumpster-fire/

  • Helen NoH North of Howard for 55 + years

    The current battle is very reminiscent of the tobacco industry's fight against restrictions on smoking and higher taxes on tobacco products.

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    That's not the same, Helen, and you know that Democrats are desperate to money-grab more from hardworking people, because they need money to continue to support people that won't work but vote for the Democratic Party.
    (The welfare state, I give you free stuff but you must vote for me.)

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    People are not buying that this is a health issue.
    What? You think the city of Chicago IS SO NICE, IT REALLY CARES ABOUT YOUR HEALTH?
    This is about REVENUE. They need YOUR MONEY.

  • Helen NoH North of Howard for 55 + years

    Man, Pedro is REALLY triggered by this sweetened beverage tax.

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    And you're triggered, Helen, because you don't like that I spread the truth.
    You, a member of the ward's Democratic party, have been pushing the idea that this is a move to protect people's health.
    You hate that I post the truth that this is about REVENUE. That, politicians are desperate to money-grab because they need to keep giving handouts to people that won't work but vote for them.

  • Rob

    Helen - make that REALLY REALLY triggered.

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    To anyone reading this:
    The soda TAX is not for protecting your health.
    It is for collecting REVENUE.

  • Jeffrey Littleton Paint/Ceramic/Glass

    Tax the people who feed the trolls.
    A Troll Tax.

  • Michael Archangel Donald Trump - An irredeemable moral failure

    @Pedrito - Again, two things can be true at the same time. This is not a black and white issue. It is both possible that the tax can be a disincentive for selecting a sugary drink and it can also be a revenue generator for the city. Perhaps your political blinders do not let you see there is more than one rationale.

  • If indeed it is a tax to protect our health why not tax sugar and baked goods? Why allow Link cards users to buy what is harmful to them? Just sayin'

  • All taxes generate revenue for one purpose or another. All properly constituted legislative bodies are allowed to levy taxes for purposes of generating revenue. Two important questions are do the taxes serve a legitimate state interest and are they compatible with the Constitution. So far, the beverage tax satisfies both requirements even though it is being challenged. Unless it fails in a court, the tax is legitimate.

  • Michael Archangel Donald Trump - An irredeemable moral failure

    @ahtnaid - Neither the City of Chicago nor Cook County have the authority to levy a tax on transactions paid by Link. That is the answer to one part of your question.

    As to why sugary drinks and not baked goods or sugar itself, I refer you to this FAQ by the CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/nutrition/data-statistics/sugar-sweetened-beverages-intake.html

  • Why do nutrition assistance programs allow sugar sweetened beverages and other non-essential food/drinks? It has nothing to do with a tax on sugar and everything to do with corporate lobbying groups. It predates this current controversy by decades! Educate yourself before whining about Link/SNAP recipients not being taxed for the same items. WIC is a completely separate program and does NOT provide sugary drinks, as it is meant for children ages 0-5 and women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.

    http://www.eatdrinkpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/FoodStampsFollowtheMoneySimon.pdf

  • Also, baked goods and sweets usually contain other nutrients, plus carbs. Most sugary drinks contain only sugar, nothing else that your body can use. By zeroing in only on drinks, we can significantly improve health.

    And Michael is correct about why people on food stamps are not charged the tax. There was no desire to exclude LINK from the tax; but it was impossible to avoid that due to federal law. In Philadelphia they got around this law by charging the tax on wholesalers, but Illinois's tax structure makes that impossible.

    And of COURSE this tax is also about revenue. It achieves two things at the same time: better health outcomes plus revenue raising. The same was true about cigarette taxes, gasoline taxes and booze taxes: money is raised and a social outcome is achieved. We can do two things at the same time, honey.

    I'd sure rather see a tax on beverages than another hike on all sales taxes or a hike in property taxes.

  • and if this tax annoys the trolls on this site, I find that delightful!
    Trolls are known to drink far too much sugar. It explains their short fuses and hostility.

  • Sandy in EdgeGlen EdgeGlen since 1987

    Someone (who’s on at least his second EveryBlock account) seems to be bouncing off the walls—sugar shock? Put down the pop and back away slowly towards the water filter on your sink...

    To clarify, the sweetened beverage tax is a Cook County tax. The City of Chicago bottled water tax is to discourage the purchase and use of disposable plastic water bottles, which will sit in landfills forever unless some recycling company can repurpose them (such as those reusable fabric shopping bags that those who lament the demise of cheap disposable bags decry as “unsanitary” and “war on the poor”). Most of the bottled water subject to the City’s tax is filtered tap water anyway.

    Sure, both taxes are revenue-raising measures. ALL taxes are! Do you think the gov’t is discriminating against homeowners by levying property taxes? Against people who buy things in general by charging sales tax? Against people who earn money or get it from investments by levying income tax? If so, then argument over—there’s no reasoning with you.

    Combining revenue with a secondary purpose for the greater good is commendable. (And drinking sweetened stuff—especially feeding it to your growing kids, no matter your income level—isnot for the greater good. No sweetened beverage tax? Fine—pay part of my healthcare costs and insurance premiums. The invoice will be in the mail),

  • You haven't a clue of what you're talking about.
    It's laughable and fully expected that you'd buy into the "save our kids" campaign.

  • just look around you. The obesity rate among U.S. children has more than tripled since the 1970s. You want nothing to be done about that?

    2/3 of U.S. children drink a sugary drink every single day. That's an automatic 9 teaspoons of sugar on top of all the other sugar they're getting from food, and many of these kids are drinking many cups of sugar drinks, not just one.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in the prevalence of physical activity and sedentary behaviors national YRBS: 1991—2015. https://www.cdc.gov/ healthyyouth/data/yrbs/pdf/trends/2015_us_physical_trend_yrbs.pdf. Accessed May 17, 2017.

  • Then why not tax SUGAR itself? Tax candy bars, Starbucks, Bakeries, Cookies and so on? This is a tax on the middle class straight up. The Poor have Link (no taxes), The Rich don't care or will just travel out of county to shop. You can tell its a cash grab when the City says they will have to lay people off if the tax is not implemented. The City is not worried about anyones "health" if they were we would not lead the nation in murders year after year. The City would not have closed 6 of 12 Mental Health Centers. You are all being gaslighted.

  • I don't for a second believe that the tax money from sugar-sweetened beverages will be funneled directly into obesity prevention. It's a money grab, the same as all the others. But I was uncomfortable with the assumption that benefits recipients are somehow lucky that their soda/pop/etc isn't taxed. That's a separate issue and it's well worth talking about, just not in this conversation.

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    I'm glad too see that so many people do not believe in this scam.

  • Sandy in EdgeGlen EdgeGlen since 1987

    The sweetened beverage tax didn’t claim to fund obesity prevention (though it did bring the issue out into the open)—it was a way to raise revenue that also disincentivizes unhealthy behavior that costs us all more in higher medical bills & insurance premiums.

    Face it—some people just don’t like taxes & regulations, period. If only they were honest enough to admit it...

  • Pedrito I offer you the RED PILL, that's all.

    Sandy,

    "a way to raise revenue that also disincentivizes unhealthy behavior"

    That's called "The pitch".

  • Sandy,
    So someone not taking responsibility for their own behavior is now my problem?
    Are you this concerned over candy bars, ice cream and the like?
    Some people just don't like taxes?
    You're kidding right?
    Gleefully waiting with baited breath for April 15th?
    It's almost tax day! YIPPIE!
    I just can't wait to do my part.
    Yes sir may I have another?
    Are you kidding?

  • I enjoy paying my taxes.

  • You need to get out more.
    A LOT more...

  • I do my taxes in the park!

14 neighbors are subscribed to this conversation.

Posted to Rogers Park

This was posted to Rogers Park

What's the news in your neighborhood? Search for your ZIP code:

e.g. 60615